When I was a kid, I was a huge Jurassic Park fan. I'd even go as far as to say, also a Michael Crichton fan. I read both Jurassic Park books, Congo and knew of his roles in many other films, shows and effects on pop culture. My admiration later faded when I learned about him being a climate change denier. I digress...
Well, this week, when I read the Lost World reference in Ross Douthat's NYT piece Is the 'Internet the Enemy of Progress?', I agreed this passage from 1995 is indeed impressively prescient:
“It means the end of innovation,” Malcolm said. “This idea that the whole world is wired together is mass death. Every biologist knows that small groups in isolation evolve fastest. You put a thousand birds on an ocean island and they’ll evolve very fast. You put ten thousand on a big continent, and their evolution slows down … And everybody on Earth knows that innovation only occurs in small groups. Put three people on a committee and they may get something done. Ten people, and it gets harder. Thirty people, and nothing happens. Thirty million, it becomes impossible. That’s the effect of mass media — it keeps anything from happening. Mass media swamps diversity. It makes every place the same. Bangkok or Tokyo or London: there’s a McDonald’s on one corner, a Benetton on another, a Gap across the street. Regional differences vanish. All differences vanish. In a mass-media world, there’s less of everything except the top ten books, records, movies, ideas. People worry about losing species diversity in the rain forest. But what about intellectual diversity — our most necessary resource? That’s disappearing faster than trees. But we haven’t figured that out, so now we’re planning to put five billion people together in cyberspace. And it’ll freeze the entire species … Everyone will think the same thing at the same time. Global uniformity.”
Heavy stuff. And Ross's editorial stumbles into the concept of “macro culture” — a few large-scale cultural models, or maybe eventually even just a global monoculture and how that reality (are we there already?) may yet still be avoided. He offers the optimism that despite how homogenized the internet is making culture, there are still subcultures on the fringe. )
However, as the editorial ends, he offers a call to action: "you can have a micro culture that resists the macro culture [but] at some point this nonconformism has to break out and actually change the world."
So, I close by asking: how are you contributing to that change? (Hat tip & future spotlight pending on The School for Moral Ambition")
For me? It's promoting bikes & the world-saving potential they represent to me. : )
Let's ride!
As always, thank you for reading,
Jon
p.s.
Heads up: I've linked to a 7000-word essay by Robin Berjon and Maria Farrell on how to resist the extractive technological monoculture by rewilding the internet below!
Upcoming Events
-
April
- 🇳🇱 25th LIVE: The Mechanics of Joy
- 🇳🇱 26th Super 73 De Pijp Pop-Up Closing Party
- 🇳🇱 27th LtD Gravel Raid
- 🇳🇱 28th Gravel Fondo Limburg
-
May
- 🇪🇸 3rd Traka
- 🇩🇪 11-12th Fenderfest
- 🇳🇱 23rd Ebike Future Show Amsterdam
- 🇳🇱 25th Velocio Ride Series Utrecht
Cycling
Transcontinental: the race that changed cycling
Cycling Industry News Interviews Karla Sommer & Daniela Odesser
Experiment: Specialized P.Commute
Ideas
We Need To Rewild The Internet
The disappearing Insta grid
You’re Not Managing Enough
Friends
From Scratch & Other Stories
Brave Feminine Interviews Merida Miller of Project Fearless
Dick Lane Velodrome is Turning 50!
Radness
Cycling the World: A New Film About a Big Journey
Thank you for reading!